🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension caused by the introduction of a new 28-point plan for achieving ceasefire appeared – momentarily – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its response: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of contrasting events captured the bleak nature of the current period. By day, diplomatic battles are fought: positive announcements are released from different nations. Immense energy is expended on restraining specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, war remains the main instrument for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's defenselessness was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from Russian territory, a ability provided through current data. From vantage locations, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to counter approaching aerial threats roared overhead – sophisticated military planes delivered to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's missile defense thundered: several firings fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably delivered by partner states. Every firing creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The brief panic quickly gives way to sober acceptance: maybe the approaching threat won't hit its mark this time, preventing destruction from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a automatic firearm opened up on a aerial vehicle somewhere nearby, part of a rapid response unit – most likely imported technology. Unfortunately, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its destination.

With pauses, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the early updates: several casualties, destruction and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As customarily, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those full day demonstrated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a need that European nations are clearly incapable to replace in the immediate future.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from American leadership provoked deep reactions, controversy and profound anxiety – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from Washington adheres to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually secure success. This trend will, undoubtedly, continue.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of consistently pushing Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington works based on a assumption well known to international relations experts: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have been unable to protect through force. The American government presumes that it is unfeasible to compel Moscow to abandon the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's south or east.

The problem is that while acknowledging this situation, American administration does minimal to deter Moscow, through statements or actions, from thinking that the current condition will not evolve additionally in its benefit in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is certain that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its allies are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to accept conditions that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is almost completely absent. There may be many attempts to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing lives and land but preventing a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its favour.

Existing Situation

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a ceasefire. Now, subjective factors are entering the equation: leadership ambitions to broker a ceasefire and secure international recognition, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any plan Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not switch to homefront challenges. And although their objective will now be much harder after latest incidents, it remains highly unlikely that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Assessment and Future

It took a just a single week to terminate the suggested clauses of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of negotiators, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new plans based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter diplomatic offensives from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and demonstrate particular unwillingness to alter the situation, if they maintain solidarity and strengthen their defence capabilities at a much faster pace. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, mainly require continued Western support.